ASDF AN AUTONOMOUS AND SCALABLE DISTRIBUTED FILE SYSTEM PDF

ASDF: An Autonomous and Scalable Distributed File System . many of the same goals as previous distributed file systems such as scalability. Distributed File System (DFS) could be a set of consumer and server .. Huang and Huan-Ming Liang, “ASDF: An Autonomous and Scalable Distributed. File. 3 / Abstract. We have simulated SimpleFS, a simple and scalable distributed file system for nowadays highly Other file systems, like TidyFS, ASDF, Ceph, etc, utilize similar concepts but take more .. ASDF: An Autonomous and. Scalable.

Author: Samutaur Samuhn
Country: Cuba
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: History
Published (Last): 1 June 2005
Pages: 461
PDF File Size: 20.41 Mb
ePub File Size: 7.20 Mb
ISBN: 381-7-23335-976-2
Downloads: 86874
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Magore

Running Lisp code to portably create executable commands from Lisp is great, but there is a bootstrapping problem: The days of work poured into getting logical pathnames to work were probably not well spent.

The require mechanism purposefully avoids loading a module that has already been provided, autonomoys making it unpopular in a culture of ubiquitous modifiable source code; if you modified a file, you really want it to be reloaded automatically.

ASDF: An Autonomous and Scalable Distributed File System – Semantic Scholar

ASDF 2 therefore performed well whether or not the code was split in a large number of systems. In autonomoue early history of Lisp, back when core memory was expensive, all programs fit in a asvf of punched cards. It can now deal with very different operating system families: The problem could be even more aggravating, since a bug in the program itself could be causing a fatal error during compilation especially since in CL, developers can run arbitrary code during compilation.

Some people advertised this alternative, that also used to work, to define your own sub-class foo-file of cl-source-fileand use: Indeed this happened when ASDF 3 tried to better support secondary systems.

ASDF 3 was pre-released as 2.

If some of the sideway dependencies were outdated, then all children needed to be forced; but ASDF 1 failed to do so. The first component is a file package.

  FSDM 1265 PDF

Previous versions of SCL tried to define additional components to a pathname, so as to natively distirbuted URLs as pathnames, but this ended up causing extra compatibility issues, and recent versions fold all the additional information into the host component. And so we introduced a new operation, initially called parent-load-op 2.

ASDF: An Autonomous and Scalable Distributed File System

But thanks to the new: A patch to this effect is pending acceptance by the new maintainer. The SBCL implementation was notable for simultaneously and legitimately 1 setting the default encoding in a given session from the same environment variables as the libc locale, which could vary wildly between developers, even more so hypothetical end-users, and 2 issuing an error rather than accept invalid UTF Usability was an important concern while developing ASDF 2.

Showing of 5 extracted citations. Dan Barlow was experimenting with new concepts, and his programming style was to write the simplest code that would work in the common casegiving him most leeway to experiment.

Thus your previous program could have been: Failed Attempts at Improvement ; and the bug that required rewriting it all over again in Appendix F: In an undocumented stroke of genius, Andreas Fuchs had been making explicit in the DAG the implicit sequencing done by traverse! In the event of a build failure, the programmer is there to diagnose scalablle issue, fix it, and interactively abort or continue the build, which eliminates most cases of the bug due to an externally interrupted build.

ASDF 3, or Why Lisp is Now an Acceptable Scripting Language (Extended version)

UIOP thus provides its functionality on a best-effort basis, within the constraint that it builds on top of what the implementation provides. The most directly user-facing bundle operations are compile-bundle-op and load-bundle-op: The road from mk-defsystem to ASDF 3 is undeniably one of overall improvements. CL has an idiom merge-pathnames pathname defaults that ostensibly serves to merge a relative pathname with an absolute pathname.

Like late s variants of DEFSYSTEM on all Lisp systems, it featured a declarative model to define a system in terms of a hierarchical tree of componentswith each component being able to declare dependencies on xn components. But the duplication felt like both a waste of both runtime resources and maintainer time.

  EYBERG CHILD BEHAVIOR INVENTORY PDF

1 Ceph Distributed Storage Sage Weil DreamHost / new dream network April 7, 2011.

Asdt CL standard accepts a strings as a pathname designator in most functions where pathname is wanted. It distributee hard to distriibuted that one big fioe, even for the maintainer, and probably impossible for newcomers to wrap their head around it. We solved this problem some years ago with cl-launch. Only then, could the same specification be used on all supported platforms with the same semantics.

Sideway means the action of operation o on component c depends-on the action of o or another operation on each of the declared dependencies of c. To build and load software, C programmers commonly use make to build the software and ld. Reducing Risk with Cloud Storage. ASDF 3 is ten times this thousand lines, because of all the infrastructure for robustness and portability, because of all the burden of hot upgrade and backward compatibility, because of all the builtin documentation and comments, and because of all the extensions that it bundles.

But the core is still a thousand lines of code or so, and these extensions, built on top of this core, illustrate its expressive power, as well as provide essential services to CL programmers.

The fact that this technique could be developed as an obvious dcalable to ASDF without the author explicitly designing the idea into it, and without having to modify the source code, is an illustration of how expressive and modular CLOS can be.

On the other hand, sometimes things are broken, and you do need a non-intrusive way of fixing them.